"And if ye go to war in your land against the enemy that oppresseth you, then ye shall blow an alarm with the trumpets; and ye shall be remembered before the LORD your God, and ye shall be saved from your enemies." - Num. 10:9
THE BATTLE OF ARMAGEDDON
"But there remained two of the men in the camp, the name of the one was Eldad, and the name of the other Medad: and the spirit rested upon them; and they were of them that were written, but went not out unto the tabernacle: and they prophesied in the camp.
And there ran a young man, and told Moses, and said, Eldad and Medad do prophesy in the camp.
And Joshua the son of Nun, the servant of Moses, one of his young men, answered and said, My lord Moses, forbid them.
And Moses said unto him, Enviest thou for my sake? would God that all the LORD'S people were prophets, and that the LORD would put his spirit upon them! - Numbers 11:27-29
ELDAD AND MEDAD PROPHECY ABOUT GOG AND MAGOG
APOSTLES OF DARKNESS - DRIVING THE NATIONS TO WAR
NICCOLD MACHIAVELLI & GOVERNMENT THROUGH DECEPTION
JOHN LOCKE WHO GAVE US GOVERNMENT BY AND FOR THE RICH
BERNARD MANDEVILLE - AVARICE
ADAM SMITH & THE FREE TRADE LIE
KARL MARX & LAISSEZ FAIRE - CAPITALISM
THOMAS MALTHUS - POPULATION REDUCTION AND REMOVAL
AS OIL PRODUCTION DECLINES, FOOD WILL DISAPPEAR
SEPARATING FACT FROM PROPAGANDA
POPULATION REMOVAL - NEW DEADLY VIRUSES
SECRET VACCINE INGREDIENT KILLS UNBORN BABIES
THE CIA IN AFRICA
THE ETHNIC BOMB - MISSING SCIENTISTS
WEATHER MODIFICATION WARFARE
BERTRAND RUSSEL AND THE NEUCLAR BOMB
THE U.S. - RUSSIAN BATTLE FOR CASPIAN OIL
ELDAD AND MEDAD PROPHECY ABOUT GOG AND MAGOG
The Targum Neof. relates that these two young men were prophesying to the people about the revolt, in the last days of Gog and Magog. What they actually said would be a little too much for a lot of modern believers who like soft words, so I’ll move on.
Right in the middle of one of his greatest writings, the Apostle Paul quotes a prophecy about ‘deceivers’ and "false prophets", given by Jude, the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ. Permit me to quote both sources to show their relationship to our day.
"To prepare God’s people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ.
Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teachingand by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming. Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ." - Eph. 4:12-15
"These men are blemishes at your love feasts, eating with you without the slightest qualm--shepherds who feed only themselves. They are clouds without rain, blown along by the wind; autumn trees, without fruit and uprooted--twice dead.
" They are wild waves of the sea, foaming up their shame; wandering stars, for whom blackest darkness has been reserved for ever."
"But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before, of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;
"How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
"These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit."
- Jude 12, 13, 17-19
This is strong language and such an awful judgement. Who are Paul and Jude talking about.???
In our previous articles dealing with the BATTLE OF ARMAGEDDON, we have looked at some of the causes leading up to this horrendous battle. I have labored to show that there is a spiritual and a physical side to this war and some of the causes driving us to the brink of this deadly war.
But we, as believers in God must remember our two great weapons: One, the Communion of the Saints (the Love we have for one another) and second, our constantly looking "unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy." Jude 24
APOSTLES OF DARKNESS - DRIVING THE NATIONS TO WAR
In this article, I will name some of the individuals, whose damnable doctrines have been used to subvert and destroy millions of people worldwide. They are deceivers and false prophets, worthy of God’s judgement, who spit upon the beauty and dignity of God’s
creation: MAN. Even though they claim to be Jews and Christians, they deliberately set aside the teachings of the Torah:
These deceivers pervert the beauty of the human body and mind.
"For You formed my inward parts; You covered me in my mother's womb.
I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; Marvelous are Your works, And that my soul knows very well. My frame was not hidden from You, When I was made in secret, And skillfully wrought in the lowest parts of the earth." - Psl. 139: 13-15
These deceivers, like their father the Devil, despise the call to Divinity in each man and woman.
"I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council:
but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire." - Matthew 5:22 According to Lev. 15:8, the Hebrew ‘raqaq’ and the Aramic ‘rakah’, which Jesus used, means to ‘spit in someone’s face’.
In the Authorized Version, this has been grievous mistranslation to read ‘say to his brother raca’. The truth is, anyone who ‘spits in his brother’s face’ will be in danger of great judgement.!!!
In this Issue, you will meet with the following characters:
Niccold Maciavelli, (1469-1527) who taught us government through deception.
John Locke (1632-1704) who gave us government by and for the Rich.
Bernard Mandeville (1670?-1733) who wanted every man to appreciate Avarice.
Adam Smith, who gave us"The Invisible Hand." of Free Trade.
Thomas Malthus, who taught us ‘Population Control’.
Karl Marx, who loaded us with enormous taxes and debt.
Bertrand Russell who personally, gave us Nuclear Weapons and World Government.
NICCOLD MACHIAVELLI & GOVERNMENT THROUGH DECEPTION
Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) may be considered the founder of modern money-based politics. Machiavelli wrote The Prince as Italy was emerging from a state of rampant anarchy.
His masterpiece was designed as a guidebook for a single, forceful leader who would eventually unify the country.
Machiavelli called for rational "interest" (calculation) instead of irrational "passion" (e.g., love, hate or honesty) in matters involving public policy: "Nor did a prince ever lack legitimate reasons by which to color his bad faith. One could cite a host of modern examples
and list the many peace treaties, the many promises that were made null and void by princes who broke faith, with the advantage going to the one who best knew how to play the fox.
But one must know how to mask this nature skillfully and be a great dissembler. Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - The Prince
"As all those who write about civic matters show and as all history proves by a multitude of examples, whoever organizes a state and establishes its laws must assume that all men are wicked and will act wickedly whenever they have the chance to do so.
He must also assume that whenever their wickedness remains hidden for a time there is a hidden reason for it which remains unknown for want of occasion to make it manifest.
But time, which is called the father of all truth. uncovers it."
– Niccolò Machiavelli, Discourses
There is now a recognized philosophic connection between modern-day neoconservatives and Irving Kristol, Leo Strauss and Machiavelli. This is important in understanding that today’s policies and the subsequent problems will be with us for years to come if these policies are not reversed.
Not only did Leo Strauss write favorably of Machiavelli, Michael Ledeen, a current leader of the neoconservative movement, did the same.
In 1999, Ledeen titled his book, Machiavelli on Modern Leadership, and subtitled: Why Machiavelli’s iron rules are as timely and important today as five centuries ago.
Ledeen is indeed an influential neocon theorist whose views get lots of attention today in Washington. His book on Machiavelli, interestingly enough, was passed out to Members of Congress attending a political strategy meeting shortly after its publication and at just about the time A Clean Break was issued.
In Ledeen’s most recent publication, The War Against the Terror Masters, he reiterates his beliefs outlined in this 1999 Machiavelli book. He specifically praises:
"Creative destruction…both within our own society and abroad…(foreigners) seeing America undo traditional societies may fear us, for they do not wish to be undone."
Amazingly, Ledeen concludes: "They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission."
If those words don’t scare you, nothing will. If they are not a clear warning, I don’t know what could be.
It sounds like both sides of each disagreement in the world will be following the principle of preemptive war. The world is certainly a less safe place for it.
In Machiavelli on Modern Leadership, Ledeen praises a business leader for correctly understanding Machiavelli: "There are no absolute solutions. It all depends.
What is right and what is wrong depends on what needs to be done and how." This is a clear endorsement of situation ethics and is not coming from the traditional left. It reminds me of: "It depends on what the definition of the word ‘is’ is."
Ledeen quotes Machiavelli approvingly on what makes a great leader. "A prince must have no other objectives or other thoughts or take anything for his craft, except war." To Ledeen, this meant: "…the virtue of the warrior are those of great leaders of any
successful organization." Yet it’s obvious that war is not coincidental to neocon philosophy, but an integral part. The intellectuals justify it, and the politicians carry it out.
There’s a precise reason to argue for war over peace according to Ledeen, for "…peace increases our peril by making discipline less urgent, encouraging some of our worst instincts, in depriving us of some of our best leaders."
Peace, he claims, is a dream and not even a pleasant one, for it would cause indolence and would undermine the power of the state.
Although I concede the history of the world is a history of frequent war, to capitulate and give up even striving for peace—believing peace is not a benefit to mankind—is a frightening thought that condemns the world to perpetual war and justifies it as a benefit and necessity.
These are dangerous ideas, from which no good can come.
The conflict of the ages has been between the state and the individual: central power versus liberty.
The more restrained the state and the more emphasis on individual liberty, the greater has been the advancement of civilization and general prosperity. Just as man’s condition was not locked in place by the times and wars of old and improved with liberty and free markets, there’s no reason to believe a new stage for man might not be achieved by believing and working for conditions of peace.
The inevitability and so-called need for preemptive war should never be intellectually justified as being a benefit. Such an attitude guarantees the backsliding of civilization.
Neocons, unfortunately, claim that war is in man’s nature and that we can’t do much about it, so let’s use it to our advantage by promoting our goodness around the world through force of arms.
That view is anathema to the cause of liberty and the preservation of the Constitution. If it is not loudly refuted, our future will be dire indeed.
Ledeen believes man is basically evil and cannot be left to his own desires. Therefore, he must have proper and strong leadership, just as Machiavelli argued.
Only then can man achieve good, as Ledeen explains: "In order to achieve the most noble accomplishments, the leader may have to ‘enter into evil.’ This is the chilling insight that has made Machiavelli so feared, admired and challenging…we are rotten," argues Ledeen.
"It’s true that we can achieve greatness if, and only if, we are properly led." In other words, man is so depraved that individuals are incapable of moral, ethical and spiritual greatness, and achieving excellence and virtue can only come from a powerful authoritarian leader.
What depraved ideas are these to now be influencing our leaders in Washington? The question Ledeen doesn’t answer is: "Why do the political leaders not suffer from the same shortcomings and where do they obtain their monopoly on wisdom?"
Once this trust is placed in the hands of a powerful leader, this neocon argues that certain tools are permissible to use.
For instance: "lying is central to the survival of nations and to the success of great enterprises, because if our enemies can count on the reliability of everything you say, your vulnerability is enormously increased."
What about the effects of lying on one’s own people? Who cares if a leader can fool the enemy? Does calling it "strategic deception" make lying morally justifiable? Ledeen and Machiavelli argue that it does, as long as the survivability of the state is at stake.
state is their goal, even if the personal liberty of all individuals has to be suspended or canceled.
"Democracy" is defined as "government by the people". But our Founding Fathers never intended for "the people" to govern themselves – governance was reserved for the moneyed class.
He was one of the great political theorists who had great influence on the framers and creation of the Constitution.
John Locke (1632-1704) made the greatest impact through his Second Treatise of Government. Locke pioneered the ideas of natural rights and private property, as well as the concept of "separation of powers" to keep any one segment of government from gaining too much power.
John Locke defines the power of the landlord over the serf, or the like, to be the principle of the rights of property, a notion sometimes translated today as "shareholder value," or, under the law of the early 1860s Confederacy as "slaveholder value."
Locke's Essays on Human Understanding define this empiricist notion; whereas, Gottfried Leibniz's belatedly published New Essays on Human Understanding exposed the wickedness of Locke's design.
It was the latter, Leibniz's work, which informed Benjamin Franklin and his circles; Leibniz's elaboration of the principle of "pursuit of happiness," became the basis on which the U.S. 1776 Declaration of Independence was premised, and the Preamble of the U.S. Federal Constitution defined.
At the point in mid-1789 the French patriots Bailly and Lafayette had crafted a proposed constitution for France's monarchy based upon American principles, Shelburne and his lackey struck from London, beginning that July 14 storming of the Bastille which was organized by Shelburne agents Philippe Egalité and Swiss banker Jacques Necker.
Later, other British agents, such as Danton and Marat, who had been trained by, and were directed from London, by the head of Shelburne's Secret Committee, Jeremy Bentham, led the way into both the Jacobin Terror and the first fascist dictatorship of modern Europe, that of the Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.
The terrorist controller Jeremy Bentham was the working head of Shelburne's British East India Company "Secret Committee," which directed the Jacobin Terror.
BERNARD MANDEVILLE - AVARICE
Bernard Mandeville (1670?-1733) rejected repression and suggested that a society based on the deadliest of the seven deadly sins  – AVARICE – would create common Machiavellian interests and suppress irrational passions. Mandeville’s ideal society was
one where the unwitting cooperation of individuals, each working for his or her own interest would result in the greatest benefit to society at large. Mandeville anticipated laissez-faire economic theory, which promoted self-interest, competition, and little government interference in the workings of the economy.
In judging these two cases it becomes clear that the Anglo-American Establishment reacted towards the socialist movement as their promoter H.G. Wells did.
International Socialism (comparable to the Nazi's National Socialism) has always been viewed as the long-term and final goal, and the Elite have always intended to take care of mankind's basic necessities once they are in power and once they have culled the herd to its desired numbers, but the primary and immediate goal has always been power and control.
Rather than work through state-sponsored socialism to gain control, which could be interrupted by the ever-present threat of Democracy, the Establishment decided instead to work around the State, to utilize laissez faire capitalism to destroy the State, and to, as Rhodes put it, "gradually absorb the wealth of the world."
Once deciding on this strategy Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich A. Hayek were employed to help carry it out.
The real nature of capitalism’s one world is plain to see. At the beginning of the 21st Century we must admit that there is more unhappiness, instability, insecurity, anxiety, and downright misery, than ever before.
This post-Cold War world is a global system of tyrannical oppression. People’s lives distorted, impoverished and imprisoned by a world in which slavish conformity is hailed as freedom and liberation as austerity.
The world capitalist system is sick and such sickness can only end in death, death of the system.
Friedrich List warned, "Without interference of national power [regulation] there is no security, no faith in coined money, in measures and weights, no security for the health of seaports, no security for the commerce at sea by the aid of a navy, no interference for the citizens in foreign seaports and countries by Consuls and Ministers, no titles to land, no patents, no copyright, no canals and railroads, no national road.
Industry entirely left to itself, would soon fall to ruin, and a nation letting everything alone [laissez faire!] would commit suicide."
This, in my opinion is what the Founding Fathers had in mind when, in the Constitution, they referred to the "General Welfare". And when the large Corporations begin whispering the lie "Let’s get Government off our backs", we had best beware!!!
Bernard Mandeville and Adam Smith were forerunners of the Synarchist cult—set out to construct what in is fact the synthetic pagan religion, such as Smith's pro-paganist, explicitly irrational, religious worship of "The Invisible Hand."
Smith had presented that same hedonistic image earlier, as the hedonistic principle of purely bestial irrationalism, copied from Mandeville's notorious, explicitly pro-Satanic, 1714 The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Public Benefits, as outlined by Smith in his 1759 The Theory of the Moral Sentiments.
That fiction which they concocted, is appropriate only for the instruction and adoration of the credulous masses of a population which is being reduced to the status of either hunted, or herded (and also culled) human cattle.
ADAM SMITH & FREE TRADE LIE
While American industry was developing, the country had no time for laissez-faire. After it had grown strong, the United States began preaching laissez-faire to the rest of the world -- and began to kid itself about its own history, believing its slogans about laissez-faire as the secret of its success.
Adam Smith made his attack on the American cause in 1776, by writing The Wealth of Nations, (better named Stealing The Wealth of Nations).
Adam Smith's argument in his anti-American propaganda-piece was largely lifted from the work of the French Physiocrats Quesnay and Turgot, this eerie, pro-Satanic dogma of laissez-faire, which plagiarist Adam Smith copied as "The Invisible Hand" of "free trade,".
The "traditional" American support for worldwide free trade is quite a recent phenomenon.
It started only at the end of the Second World War. This period dominates the memory of most Americans now alive but does not cover the years of America's most rapid industrial expansion.
As the business historian Thomas McCraw, of the Harvard Business School, has pointed out, the United States, which was born in the same year as The Wealth of Nations, never practiced an out-and-out mercantilist policy, as did Spain in the colonial days.
But "it did exhibit for 150 years after the Revolution a pronounced tendency toward protectionism, mostly through the device of the tariff."
Only after she achieved industrial preeminence did she begin to advocate free trade to the world as a means of opening up markets for her manufactured goods.
And then Britain's long-term economic decline began at the very moment that she began adopting laissez
faire policies, so much so that the vast and mighty Empire, upon which the sun never set, was forced to depend on American economic might to rescue it from both world wars.
Britain's merchants, bankers and upper class families became rich through laissez faire policies, but the British government, the national economy, and the people as a whole suffered.
Under President John Adams, the New York City publication of British Foreign Office agent Sir John Robison's Proofs of a Conspiracy, rallied the New England-based Essex Junto tribes to persuade the Adams government that the United States must tend to ally with the British monarchy,
against the revolutionary France that Lord Shelburne's British East India Company had brought into being, all for the purpose of crushing the American cause on both sides of the Atlantic!
This was that induced delusion of the Adams government, which produced the crisis of the Alien & Sedition Acts, and which led, by related means, to the disgrace and death of the Federalist Party, especially after the British Foreign Office agent Aaron Burr's killing of Alexander Hamilton, the clearest head among leading American figures on these issues at that time.
Shelburne's purpose was threefold. First, his intent, as he had confided this to his lackey Gibbon, was to create a new pro-paganist Roman Empire modeled upon Gibbon's portrayal of the successes and fatal defects of the ancient Roman Empire.
Second, Shelburne was determined to eradicate the influence of the American Revolution throughout both Europe and the Americas.
Third, as Shelburne had confided to his lackey Adam Smith in 1763, he was determined to destroy not only the North American economies, but also France, that as a part of preventing any development on continental Europe which might threaten the world-imperial designs of the financier-oligarchical British East India Company's position as the world's leading maritime power, an imperial maritime power virtually established by the Company's subjugation of India.
The American System of political-economy, which is the characteristic intent of the U.S. Federal Constitution of 1787-1789, is implicitly dedicated to a system of national banking and protectionism, as the first U.S.
Treasury Secretary, Hamilton, described this. The European systems, insofar as they have been freed from the murky relics of Habsburg rule, are premised upon a system contrary to the intent of the U.S. Constitution, a system sometimes called "capitalism."
That form of "capitalism" is a defective system, praised as "scientific" by the misguided Karl Marx, which has been modeled upon the Anglo-Dutch Liberal system of parliamentary government.
The central flaw in such systems of parliamentary government, is the role of what has become known today as "independent central banking systems," which, periodically, exert a more or less openly dictatorial rule over the governments with which they share power.
KARL MARX & LAISSEZ FAIRE - CAPITALISM
Industrialization, beginning in the late 1700s, created a demand for new markets and increased raw materials; both demands spurred accelerated expansion of empire. Wealthy
investors amassed fortunes by setting up large-scale industrial and trading operations, leading to the emergence of an influential capitalist elite. Like any other elite, capitalists used their wealth and influence to further their own interests however they could.
And the interests of capitalism always come down to economic growth; investors must reap more than they sow or the whole system comes to a grinding halt.
In capitalist countries like the United States, Britain and Australia, the ruling circles are hidden behind a "democratic" facade of parliaments and elections. As Karl Marx correctly pointed out, parliamentary elections give the people the right every few years to choose which member of the ruling class will misrepresent them in parliament.
The constantly reinforced myth is that the "people" elect the politicians, who thus determine government policy.
The plain facts reveal otherwise. The very nature of the capitalist system means Money Rules and the real power centers are often well concealed. The modern state serves capitalism, not the "people".
Parliaments are simply talking shops to conceal the truth that the country’s real policies are shaped by decisions taken by transnational corporations and their local big business associates.
Another vigorous defender of the American System was Henry Carey, the economic advisor of Abraham Lincoln.
A devout Christian, Carey clearly understood the evils of British colonialism and the oppressive anti-Christian nature of their economic system.
In his writings he saw that slavery was the key component of "free trade,"
Hence it is that we see the SLAVE TRADE prevail to so great an extent in all the countries subject to the British system.
The system to which the world is indebted for these results is called "free trade''; but there can be no freedom of trade where there is no freedom of man, for the first of all commodities to be exchanged is labor, and the freedom of man consists only in the exercise of the right to determine for himself in what manner his labor shall be employed, and how he will dispose of its products.
It [the British System] is the most gigantic system of slavery the world has yet seen, and therefore it is that freedom gradually disappears from every country over which England is enabled to obtain control....
The system commonly called free trade tends to produce the former results [the cheapening of labor and land everywhere, the perpetuation of SLAVERY, and the extension of its domain]; and where man is enslaved there can be no real freedom of trade.
That one which looks to protection against this extraordinary system of taxation, tends to enable men to determine for themselves whether they will make their exchanges abroad or at home; and it is in this power of choice that consists the freedom of trade and of man.
By adopting the 'free trade,' or British, system we place ourselves side by side with the men who have ruined Ireland and India, and are now poisoning and enslaving the Chinese people.
By adopting the other, we place ourselves by the side of those whose measures tend not only to the improvement of their own subjects, but to the emancipation of the slave everywhere, whether in the British Islands, India, Italy, or America...The modern school of political economy [the British school] says, ‘Be not fruitful; do not multiply. Population tends to increase faster than food.’ It prescribes disobedience to
the earliest of God’s commands.
Obedience thereto, in those who are poor, is denounced as improvidence… To have children to develop all the kindly and provident feelings of the parents, is a crime worthy of punishment.
Charity is denounced as tending to promote the growth of population… Southey denounced the Byronian school of poetry as ‘satanic’ and so may we fairly do with the political economy that has grown out of the colonial system… It teaches every thing but Christianity…
The Chicago School can be rightly blamed for the present corporate domination of the West that has eroded the ideal and indeed the very practice of democracy.
It can be blamed for the economic subjugation of the Third World, for its increasing state of poverty, filth and ignorance, and for its continual status as an undeveloped source of cheap raw materials and labor, but dependent on goods peddled by Western corporations.
The Chicago School can also be blamed for the breakdown of the Nation-State as an institution that exists to serve the people, guided by the people in a democratic fashion on behalf of the general welfare of all the people.
The Chicago School is at the very heart of the Establishment that has been erecting the framework of the New World Order, that envisions the complete destruction of the Nation-State and the creation of a single authoritarian World Government.
THOMAS MALTHUS - POPULATION REDUCTION AND REMOVAL
Thomas Malthus became most famous for his early work "An Essay on the Principle of Population," T.R. 1970. Penguin Books, New York published anonymously in 1798. In it. Malthus presented a new and controversial view on population, namely that it naturally tends to increase more and more - but always faster than the natural resources required to sustain that population.
Whereas population will increase geometrically, natural resources can only increase arithmetically.
The ultimate result of this, if unchecked, would be overpopulation, starvation, disease, war, etc. - nothing that anyone really wants.
Thus, it is incumbent upon governments to work to reduce population increases in order to preserve the future stability of society.
The consequences of an unchecked population has become known as a
Malthusians catastrophe. Malthus' idea that a population is necessarily limited in its development by the nature of its resources had an important influence on the ideas of Charles Darwin.
The world, according to Thomas Malthus and David Ricardo (the authors of this cheerless and stark system of "labor management") is divided between the "haves" and the "have nots" - i.e., the rich and the poor; the capitalists and the laborers.
It is a severe and cold world based on efficiency and ability in which the most productive rise to the top of the economic pecking order and the least productive fall to the bottom;
in other words, a world where the rich have gotten where they are because they are BETTER than anyone else, and the poor have gotten where they are because they aren't.
By the 1830s, Malthus and Ricardo's "Economic Science" was becoming established in a legal code which regarded the poor as a blight on the human condition.
What was needed for the poor who couldn't find work was not charity, but the discipline of a workhouse-prison. Polanyi writes,
"Never perhaps in all modern history has a more ruthless act of social reform (i.e., the legislation that legalized the economic system that Malthus and Ricardo advocated) been perpetrated; it crushed multitudes of lives while merely pretending to provide relief in the creation of the "workhouse-prison."
The miserable and cruel "end-result" of this kind of thinking manifested itself in the 1830s in Ireland, which had been subjected by the English a century earlier.
After the English conquest, Parliament instituted a number of agricultural reforms which were meant to establish Ireland as the "breadbasket" for England.
Ireland's utility to the Industrial Revolution - which had taken hold on England and forced the English peasantry off the land and into the new industrial work force.
In order to further this end, agribusiness farming techniques which utilized vast amounts of land and a highly transient agricultural work force were introduced into Ireland.
As a result, Ireland's peasants were forced off their individual farms (actually, land which the old Irish aristocracy had allotted to the peasants to "share crop") and into mobile agricultural work gangs.
The purpose of these reforms was to streamline Ireland's ability to produce food for export to England.
Ireland's surplus population which resulted from these reforms was pushed into the unproductive lands of Western Ireland where they were reduced to growing potatoes on small patches of ground to sustain themselves.
In the mid 1830s a blight hit Ireland's potatoes and resulted in the great "Potato Famine" of that era - a famine which killed off almost half of Ireland's population.
What most people do not realize about this famine, however, is that during the entire period of the famine itself (1835-1838), Ireland, under it's new "plantation economy" - an economic system which approximated the "plantation economy" of the Old South - continued to ship an abundant supply of food to England.
It's interesting to note in this connection that both Malthus and Ricardo considered themselves to be Christians. They believed that their new "Economic Science" was based on unchangeable Biblical principles.
The heartlessly philosophical basis for the system that Malthus and Ricardo devised was coldly explained by Adam Smith who said, "The people who own the country ought to govern it."
AS OIL PRODUCTION DECLINES, FOOD WILL DISAPPEAR
Modern agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food. World agriculture is now highly dependent on oil and natural gas for fertilizers and pesticides. As a base for the production of these materials, oil and natural gas are irreplaceable.
Billions of people now depend on food production that requires substantial inputs of petroleum fuels to power farm machinery, for fertilisers, herbicides and transport. Without these inputs, agricultural productivity would markedly decline.
The effect of the depletion of world oil and its close associate, natural gas, on overall world food production cannot be ignored. Vast hectares are powered, planted and harvested by machines that run on fossil fuels. Crops are hauled to central processing points, and then to market by huge trucks.
Food is distributed to remote areas and cities by vehicles run on oil.
If the fertilizers, partial irrigation (in part provided by oil energy) and pesticides were withdrawn, corn yields, for example, would drop from 130 bushels per acre to about 30 bushels.
The additional hundred bushels has been produced on ‘ghost acres’, which do not exist except in the form of fertilizers, made with natural gas and oil for pesticides.
When these ghost acres no longer exist, agricultural productivity will be dramatically reduced. - Youngquist, W., Population and Environment, A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, "The Post Petroleum paradigm and population", Volume 20, No 4, March 1999.
Apparently a decision was reached by the secret government, in the White House in 1972 on the basis of a meeting of world leaders under Nixon.
One of the attendees of that meeting said that they had the meeting and agreed that the planet was overpopulated and that it had to be reduced.
The decision was to reduce the population from 5 billion, which it was at that time, to 1 billion by the year 2000.
They were to use any and all means to do this. They believed that the earth could only handle 1 billion inhabitants.
Their problem was how to exterminate 80% of the world population in 30 years. They modified the figure to be 2 billion by 2000, but the AIDS thing is going to take care of a good part of that for them.
The latest figures coming out of Washington indicate that Africa is now as good as doomed. In another ten years, 75% of Africa will be dead.
"Today's population cannot be sustained on the 'interest' generated by natural ecosystems, but is consuming its vast supply of natural capital -- especially deep, rich agricultural soils, 'fossil' groundwater, and biodiversity -- accumulated over centuries to eons.
In some places soils, which are generated on a time scale of centimeters per century are disappearing at rates of centimeters per year.
Some aquifers are being depleted at dozens of times their recharge rates, and we have embarked on the greatest extinction episode in 65 million years.
-- Paul Ehrlich (Sept. 25, 1998)
"Quality and Degradation: The loss of productive soil has occurred as long as crops have been cultivated.
Lal and Pierce in stating this, report that land degradation has now become a major threat to the sustainability of world food supply.
This loss arises from soil erosion, salinization, waterlogging, and urbanization with its associated highway and road construction. Nutrient depletion, overcultivation, overgrazing, acidification, and soil compaction contribute as well.
Many of these processes are caused or are aggravated by poor agricultural management practices.
Taken together or in various combinations, these factors decrease the productivity of the soil and substantially reduce annual crop yields, and, more important, will reduce crop productivity for the long term."SEPARATING FACT FROM PROPAGANDAWhile the future of food production on earth does appear to be plagued with difficulties, that does not mean that we cannot feed ourselves. It is not necessary for u to kill of two out of every three people on earth, to ensure ‘our’ survival.
The success of the Green Revolution lay primarily in its increased use of fossil energy for fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation to raise crops as well as in improved seed.
It greatly increased the energy-intensiveness of agricultural production, in some cases by 100 fold or more.
Plant breeding was principally aimed at designing plants that could tolerate high levels of fertilizer use and improving the harvest index (10).
The Green Revolution was technologically suited to special circumstances: relatively level land with adequate water for irrigation and fertilizer, and in nations that could acquire the other needed resources.
The Revolution has been implemented in a manner that has not proved to be environmentally sustainable.
The technology has enhanced soil erosion, polluted groundwater and surface-water resources, and increased pesticide use has caused serious public health and environmental problems.
Opportunities exist to reduce these negative environmental and social impacts. Research is underway at most of the International Crop Research Centers to make the Revolution more environmentally and socially sustainable.
"In line with recent studies, we estimate that with the world population at 5.5 billion, food production is adequate to feed 7 billion people a vegetarian diet, with ideal distribution and no grain fed to livestock.
Yet possibly as many as two billion people are now living in poverty (V. Abernathy, pers. comm.), and over I billion in "utter poverty"
live with hunger. Inadequate distribution of food is a substantial contributing factor to this current situation.
"Currently ruminant livestock like cattle and sheep, graze about half of the earth's total land area. In addition, about one-quarter of world cropland is devoted to producing grains and other feed for livestock.
About 38% of the world's grain production is now fed to livestock. In the United States, for example, this amounts about 135 million tons yr of grain, of a total production of 312 million tons yr, sufficient to feed a population of 400 million on a vegetarian diet.
If humans, especially in developed countries, moved toward more vegetable protein diets rather than their present diets, which are high in animal protein foods, a substantial amount of grain would become available for direct human consumption.
"Worldwide soil erosion has caused farmers to abandon about 430 million ha of arable land during the last 40 years, an area equivalent to about one-third of all present cropland.
Each year at least 10 million ha are lost to land degradation that includes the spread of urbanization. For example, Tolba reported that the rate of soil loss in Africa has increased 20-fold during the past 30 years.
"Irrigation: irrigation is vital to global food production: About 16% of the world's cropland is under irrigation.
This area contributes about one-third of crop production, yielding about 2 1/2 times as much per ha as nonirrigated land. In arid lands crops must be irrigated and this requires large quantities of water and energy .
For example, the production of 1 kg of the following food and fiber products requires: 1400 liters of irrigation water for corn; 4700 liters for rice, and 17 000 liters for cotton. About 70% of the fresh water used by humans is expended for irrigation.
"Much of the world's irrigated land is being damaged by salinization and waterlogging from improper irrigation techniques. It is sufficiently severe over 10% of the area to suppress crop yields.
This damage, together with reduced irrigation development and population growth, has led, since 1978, to declining world irrigated area per capita Serious salinization problems already exist in India, Pakistan, Egypt, Mexico, Australia. and the United States.
"Because salt levels are naturally high in these regions, the problem of salt build-up is particularly severe.
Recent research puts the current loss of world farmland due to salinization alone at 1.5 million ha yr or almost 1 % yr, a loss presently being more than made up by expansion of irrigation.
If the damage continues, nearly 30% of the world's presently irrigated acreage will be lost by 2025 and nearly 50% lost by 2050, losses increasingly difficult to make up."
POPULATION REMOVAL - NEW DEADLY VIRUSES
Jacques Cousteau, the oceanographer, was warmly cheered after he announced that to save and make the earth sustainable, over 350,000 of its human inhabitants would have to be eliminated each day.
"If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer-virus to lower human population levels." - Prince Phillip of Great Britain husband of Queen Elizabeth and President of World Wildlife Fund
Pity the man or woman who opposes the Green Barbarians. Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, Bill Clinton’s point man in killing off living things and destroying roads, dams, and forests, bluntly states, "We must identify our enemies and drive them into oblivion." Such people as these would make Thomas Malthus proud!!!
Apparently, many do not believe in waiting for Mother Nature to kill off 2/3s of Earth’s population. Therefore, in order to hoard Earth’s food resource for themselves, they feel they must assist Mother Nature by creating new viruses and diseases to facilitate the process.
With the spectacular rise of genetic engineering over the last two decades, more than 30 new emerging diseases have appeared around the world. Some of the better-known diseases include AIDS, Legionnaire’s disease, toxic shock syndrome, Lyme disease, hepatitis C, "mad cow disease", hanta virus, various new encephalitis and hemorrhagic viruses, Lassa fever, and Ebola virus.
(New controversial diseases like chronic fatigue syndrome and Persian Gulf War Syndrome affecting Gulf War veterans are not included in the CDC’s list of emerging diseases.)
Our Secret Government has recently taken a keen interest in the field of vaccines. They have established a special task force to oversee the administration of vaccines to children and adults throughout the world, called the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI).
The first meeting of this eerie and ominous GAVI task force was held in Davos, Switzerland, in 2000.
Its members include Microsoft's Bill and Melinda Gates, the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO), the Rockefeller Foundation, and the World Bank.
The national governments of Russia and the U.S.A. are also involved. Bill Gates, for now, seems to be the principal force behind the work of GAVI.
Microsoft founder, Bill Gates, reputed to be the world's richest man, is helping to fund the United Nations vaccine programs.
Gates, a secular Jew, has said he does not believe in God.
He regularly attends former Communist party boss Mikhail Gorbachev's annual State of the World Forum held at the former Presidio Army base in California
Gates, whose Microsoft is at the forefront of developing new nanotransistor technology, says he has 24 billion dollars of his own money to give away. A lot of this money is going
to go toward the development of new vaccines, which the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) will administer by injections of the world's poor.
SECRET VACCINE INGREDIENT KILLS UNBORN BABIES
Bill Gates, said to be the richest man on earth, and his wife, Melinda, are also known to support Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion and global depopulation causes.
According to reliable sources, some of the new vaccines being developed by the United Nations (WHO) with Gates' money secretly contain poisonous chemicals—chemicals which act to kill unborn babies inside the mothers' womb.
In 1999, the American Life League was horrified to discover that UN vaccines were being used as hidden depopulation "bombs." The pro-life group went straight to Bill Gates with its discovery and confronted him, as the following news report indicates:
Gates-Sponsored Vaccine Program a Depopulation Measure?
Washington, Dec. 14 (LSN.ca)—The American Life League, a pro-life organization, confronted software mogul Bill Gates last week, telling him that a World Health Organization (WHO) tetanus vaccination program undertaken with Gates' sponsorship bears striking resemblance to a similar WHO program which was exposed as a measure to involuntarily sterilize young women in the Philippines.
Gates has donated $26 million to a WHO tetanus program in several developing countries.
In its press release, the American Life League notes that a previous tetanus program, conducted in the Philippines in 1995, aroused suspicion from Catholic health workers since it involved only women in their child-bearing years, an oddity since tetanus effects men and women, old and young alike.
An investigation revealed that the women were given the tetanus vaccine combined with a chemical called Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (HCG) to create an anti-pregnancy agent.
The BBC, in conjunction with the Philippine Department of Health and the Philippine Medical Association, reported that many Filipino women suffered spontaneous abortions due to the vaccine, which creates an immune response to pregnancy in the mother's body.
Leonard Horowitz’ Warning to America
"The roots of Third World foreign policy was established under Kissinger’s anti-Communist direction.
During this period, President Nixon appealed for urgent action for population control. African economic, military, and "humanitarian" policies were shaped by Kissinger, Nixon, and later Jimmy Carter to force compliance with American economic and political objectives.
Subsequent World Bank, NASA, and even National Academy of Sciences (NAS) activities in Africa expressed the imperialist
philosophy. USAID and WHO sponsored ‘immunization programs’ in central Africa, likewise, reflected American intelligence interests, and were even used by CIA agents to infiltrate the region.
The appointment of Dr. Henry Kissinger in 1968 as National Security Advisor – the most influential position in the Nixon White House – is noteworthy.
Kissinger’s alternate was Mr. Roy Ash, the President of Litton Industries – among the world’s largest military weapons contractors, and parent company of the Army’s biological weapons contracting firm Litton Bionetics with whom Dr. Robert Gallo of the NCI worked.
"Litton military contracts, during the first Nixon administration, exceeded $5 billion.
Litton Bionetics received approximately $2 million a year during this time under one NCI contract entitled, "Investigations of Viral Carcinogenesis in Primates."
Another contract called for Bionetics to supply NCI researchers throughout the world with primates for cancer studies. At this same time, Congress supplied the DOD with the same allotment, $2 million a year, for AIDS-like virus development.
"All of this occurred while Henry Kissinger controlled The Defense Program Review Committee, which considered the funding requests for military expenditures including biological weapons.
Upon taking office as advisor for national security, Kissinger ordered Melvin Laird to reassess America’s biological weapons capabilities.
His subsequent public urging of Nixon’s signing of the Geneva Accord, outlawing the use of biological weapons, contradicted his secret appropriations directives which guaranteed the CIA’s ability to stockpile biological weapons for covert operations as late as 1975, and likely beyond.
"Between 1969 and 1976, Kissinger also directed the powerful 40 Committee that authorised covert actions by the CIA in Central Africa in the vicinity where AIDS and Ebola first broke out.
Ebola initially struck a South African woman in 1975, and then several hundred people in southern Sudan and northern Zaire in 1976. AIDS, of course, was initially seen simultaneously in Central Africa and New York City in 1978.
Under Kisssinger’s National Security Council directives, USAID began focusing vast resources on controlling Third World populations by the late 1960’s.
A computer search of "USAID" "Population Control," "Vaccines," and "World Health Organization" literature between 1970 and 1975 revealed 733 "USAID-Population Control" studies.
The same search after 1975 found none.
The entire field of "Population Control" had vanished from view. The subject heading had been terminated and replaced with the more comforting "maternal and child health."
THE CIA IN AFRICA
"Between 1970 and 1975, Kissinger ordered the CIA to begin a major covert military
operation against MPLA (communist bloc backed) "rebels" in Angola.
Indebted by over $4.5 billion to the International Monetary Fund, Zaire, headed by President Mobutu – paradoxically regarded as one of the world’s richest men with "a personal fortune put at $2,939,200,000 [1984 estimate] banked in Switzerland"
– was wooed by NATO allies during the 1970s to be a staging area for CIA backed, Portuguese, French, and South African, mercenaries.
American corporate investment, notably in copper, aluminum, and diamonds, doubled following a 1970 visit by Mobutu to the United States. Major investors included Rockefeller’s Chase-Manhattan Bank.
In 1975, however, Mobutu turned against NATO allies. He proclaimed his intention to nationalize foreign owned enterprises, and expelled the American ambassador.
He ordered his military to arrest CIA agents, and placed some of them under death sentences.
"The following year, in October 1976, the Ebola virus broke-out in fifty-five Zairian villages, first killing people who had received injections.
Mobutu then ordered his army to seal off the Bumba Zone with roadblocks and shoot anyone trying to leave.
"By the end of 1976, the Zairian leader had reconciled his differences with American intelligence and, thereafter, continued to reap his Western allies’ economic and "humanitarian" aid.
About the same time, Mobutu signed an agreement with a West German company named OTRAG (Orbital Transport-und Raketen-Aktiengesellschaft). The company leased 260,000 square kilometers of eastern Zaire for military/industrial purposes.
The contract gave OTRAG sovereign rights to territories inhabited by 760,000 people in the region not far from what is now called, "The AIDS Highway."
"Believed to be of military and intelligence gathering significance to NATO, OTRAG’s principals included several Nazi scientists including Dr. Kurt H. Debus, who worked as director of the Cape Canaveral space program until 1975 before transferring to Zaire.
Richard Gompertz, OTRAG’s technical director, presided over NASA’s Chrysler space division.
Lutz Thilo Kayser, OTRAG’s founder and manager, when young was quite close to the Nazi rocket industry, often called ‘Dadieu’s young man,’ a reference to Armin Dadieu, his mentor, who served as prominent SS officer and as Goring’s special representative for a research program on storing uranium.
"In 1977, at the height of OTRAG’s activity in Zaire, Litton Industries, Bionetics’s parent, received $5 million for medical electronic equipment from its Hellige division, in Freiburg, West Germany.
Much of Litton’s NATO and West German sales during this period appear to have been earmarked for OTRAG, which may have been subcontracting at the behest of the DOD through Bionetics.
"Concurrently, cooperative efforts were recorded by NATO and WHO officials to coordinate preparations for facing possible epidemics from biological warfare.
"These circumstances deserve further investigation especially considering the recent outbreaks of the world’s most feared and deadly viruses. Marburg, Ebola, Reston, and AIDS share the dubious distinction of breaking out in or around areas of CIA/NATO, Bionetics, or OTRAG operations.
"Could it be that the individuals and institutions most likely to have created HIV and its relatives are now the ones most capitalizing on its effects? Surely the AIDS pandemic is big business.
In the words of Alfred P. Sloan, "ignorance of the principles of capitalism and free enterprise is both a danger and an opportunity."
Undoubtedly, the millions of HIV/AIDS patients and their families will find it harder than the Sloans to appreciate the opportunity."
THE ETHNIC BOMB - MISSING SCIENTISTS
Recently, British weapons expert David Kelly was found dead in the woods, southwest of Oxford with his left wrist slashed. Mr Kelly was doing research on genetic and biological warfare.
Several other scientists from around the world, seeking to build a ‘genetic bomb’ have likewise disappeared. In North Lorea, a scientist working on a genetic bomb’ that would kill only ‘whites’, has been kidnapped.
About the same time, a top North Korean scientist, Dr. Ri Chae Woo, working on a race-based bomb, also vanished. Was he taken by Western intelligence operatives or did the Chinese nab him?
In the 1980s, South Africa's apartheid regime ran a biological weapons program called "Project Coast".
According to an April 2001 U.S. Air Force Report one of the program's goals was to develop a "black bomb" via genetic engineering research. The "black bomb" would weaken or kill blacks but not whites.
On November 15, 1998, the Sunday Times of London ran a front page article reporting that the Israelis were planning an ethnic bomb.
The article stated that the Israelis were trying to identify distinctive genes carried by some Arabs, particularly Iraqis. "The intention is to use the ability of viruses and certain bacteria to alter the DNA inside their host's living cells.
The scientists are trying to engineer deadly microorganisms that attack only those bearing the distinctive genes."
WEATHER MODIFICATION WARFARE
In January, 1960 (43 years ago!) Nikita Khrushchev announced to the Presidium: "We have a new weapon, just within the portfolio of our scientists, so to speak, which is so powerful that, if unrestrainedly used, it could wipe out all life on earth. It is a fantastic weapon."
On July 4, 1976 the KGB began its massive and continuing weather engineering over North America. It continues to this day. The Russians know how to create hurricanes and earthquakes using scalar technology.
But don’t be fooled, the U.S. also has this technology: Senator Claiborne Pell several years ago had been quoted in a news story in which he had said, "Now that we can control the weather, create earthquakes and tidal waves and use it as a weapon of war we need to do a treaty."
BERTRAND RUSSEL AND THE NEUCLAR BOMB
Bertrand Russell was the person who was responsible, personally, for the development of nuclear weapons.
Russell explained what his policy was: His policy was, preventive nuclear war. His policy was, as he stated it, in a paper he published, in his organ, in September of 1946; his purpose was, to use preventive nuclear warfare, to bring the nations of the world, to submit to world government, and give up national sovereignty.
Truman presided over the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The biggest lie regarding this event is the one most often repeated, which is that these bombs saved a million American lives. General Douglas MacArthur himself believed that the bombs were cruel and unnecessary and that a land invasion of Japan would never have been needed.
The only purpose it served was to fuel the Cold War by creating Russian mistrust of American intentions.
How did Russia, China, and North Korea react, during the Korean War, to their conviction that they faced similar threats from the U.S. Truman Administration? How did they read a pattern of certain provocative moves from the Truman Administration.
What did these nations, which believed themselves targets, read into the publication of the threat from the most evil living person of the world at that time, Bertrand Russell, in Russell's September 1946 publication of his argument for his doctrine of "preventive nuclear warfare" against the Soviet Union?"
Truman created the CIA by signing the National Security Act in 1947. This act placed the USA on a permanent war footing in which 'security analysts' began to scour the globe looking for any potential American enemies.
The godfather of the CIA was Sir William Stephenson, the head of British Intelligence in the US, and the CIA immediately began to act as agents of Empire, be it the Anglo or American form.
The combination of Truman's order for the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Bertrand Russell's publication of his September 1946 declaration of a policy of preventive nuclear warfare targeting the Soviet Union in particular,
and President Harry Truman's endorsement of Winston Churchill's widely celebrated "Iron Curtain" address, had defined a situation in which both Stalin's Soviet Union shared Mao Tse Tung's China belief that the U.S.A. and Britain were determined to use nuclear weaponry to threaten them with virtual extinction as states.
Not long after Truman's retirement, and the death of Josef Stalin, the most evil man of the world at that time, Bertrand Russell, negotiated an accommodation with the new Soviet leader Khrushchev, through the facility of a London Conference of World Parliamentarians for World Government.
Russell's intention was, as usual for him, world government, his own burning hatred against the existence of, above all, the United States. His often restated intent was to establish the kind of world government which he and H.G. Wells had prescribed in Wells' 1928 The Open Conspiracy.
It was on behalf of world government, explicitly, which Russell had explicitly proposed preventive nuclear warfare as the road to utopia and peace, publicly and repeatedly, from 1946 on.
Thus, after the succession of the Russell-negotiations around the 1962 missile crisis and the assassination of President Kennedy, the United Nations hosted an approximation of imperial world government in the emerging "détente" arrangements between the Anglo-American and Soviet nuclear superpowers.
Wars among the superpower blocs were permitted, such as the U.S. Indo-China war, as long as they were "managed" according to the current vogue in Rand Corporation-type sand-box notions of "rules of the game." This arrangement continued, until 1989, with the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, and, soon after that, the Soviet Union itself.
The only reason Russell gave that up, was that at a later point, the Soviet Union got a priority in developing a deployable thermonuclear weapon.
And at that point, Russell's dream of preventive nuclear warfare ended, until Dick Cheney revived the policy in 1991; it was turned down by then-President Bush, but successfully revived the policy, after Sept. 11, 2001.
The problem for the United States is that we are running out of oil at a much faster rate than formerly believe. Projections now are that we have 80% less oil reserves, world wide than is publicly reported.
THE U.S. - RUSSIAN BATTLE FOR CASPIAN OIL
Since the mid-late 1990s the Caspian Sea region of Central Asia was thought to hold approximately 200 billion barrels of untapped oil (the later would be comparable to Saudi Arabia's reserve base)."
- "The Unseen Conflict -- War Plans, Backroom Deals, Leverage and Strategy
-- Securing What's Left of the Planet's Oil Is and Has Always Been the Bottom Line," - Michael Ruppert, From The Wilderness (October 18, 2002)
What’s behind the arrest and detention of billionaire Khodorkovsky? Many are worried that the Kremlin could launching a broad revision of the results of the ‘privatization’ of the 1990s, in which tycoons like Khodorkovsky snapped up prized chunks of state assets.
Some analysts believe that Khodorkovsky's arrest will serve as an example to other phenomenally wealthy Russians to refrain from challenging Putin.
Khodorkovsky, a Russian Jew, became fabulously wealthy after when former Soviet state industries were auctioned off at bargain basement prices.
RUSSIA DOES NOT NEED TO INVADE ISRAEL BUT IT MAY WELL NEED TO INVADE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
About one month ago, Russia discreetly invoked MAD again, but this time in the Middle East in direct response to hysterical Israeli threats to nuke Iran with submarine-launched American Harpoon missiles.
Rest assured that the American-Israeli Harpoons are nuclear, and the Zionists have every intention of using them on Tehran and Damascus if they think they can get away with it.
Quietly and with the minimum of fuss, Russia deployed its most advanced tactical nuclear missiles and crews to both Syria and Iran, thereby sending an unmistakable diplomatic signal that if Israel attacked Tehran or Damascus with nuclear weapons, Russia would in return instantly and anonymously vaporize the Jewish State.
This is not an idle or exaggerated threat. The Russian missile type deployed in Syria and Iran is the P270 Moskit [Mosquito], known in NATO circles as the SS-N-22 "Sunburn", once described by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher as "the most dangerous anti-ship missile in the Russian, and now the Chinese, fleet."
The ship borne version of this missile is launched from deck mounted quad tubes, but since Rohrabacher made his comments, Russia has adapted the Sunburn for submerged launch from submarines, air launch from Sukhoi 27s, and single surface launch from modified 40’ flatbed trucks.
Nowadays, western defense experts unambiguously view all versions of Sunburn as the "most dangerous missiles in the world".
Flying faster than rifle bullets, the Sunburns will approach Tel Aviv and Haifa at twice the speed of sound, detonating in blinding white 200 Kiloton flashes designed to instantly transform animal vegetable and mineral into heat and light.
Russia has not threatened anyone at all. Because Sunburn flies below the horizon it cannot be detected or logged by radar, and a 200-kiloton hole in the middle of Tel Aviv will yield no clues.
On 17 October 2003, Russian President Vladimir Putin responded to this crude threat, pointing out that although Russia had scrapped hundreds of its ICBMs under various disarmament treaties, it still has a "significant amount" of SS-19 intercontinental ballistic missiles that had never been previously deployed, and thus were not part of disarmament negotiations, which remain mothballed for emergency use.
"These are the most powerful rockets in the world", Putin said, adding they would be the perfect weapons for breaking through any potential American missile defense shield. Unconfirmed rumor suggests that Russia has a minimum of two hundred unused SS-19s in storage.
Within 48-hours of this stern Russian warning, frantic Zionist talk of firing ICBMs at "terrorist targets" in the Eastern Hemisphere became muted, then stopped completely.
Just one week later on 24 October, President Putin redefined the limits of American access in the Eastern Hemisphere when he opened a new Russian air base at Kant in Kyrgyzstan, just twenty miles to the east of a rented American base at Manas, used for supporting "counter terrorist" operations in Afghanistan.
And while a squadron of cutting-edge Russian Sukhoi 27 multi-role aircraft screamed overhead performing complex aerobatics at the opening ceremony, the Chinese quietly moved a squadron of their own Sukhoi 27s up to Kashi air base, which is the closest airfield to their own border with Kyrgyzstan.
Completely coincidental timing of course, and anyone who suggests otherwise will be labeled a "conspiracy theorist" by CNN, NBC, Fox News and many others.
In August and September 2003, the Russian and Chinese navies held large independent exercises in the Pacific, both coincidentally designed to, "Simulate sinking aggressive American carrier battle groups".
No prizes for guessing the name of the principal weapon system selected for this challenging task.
During September, the Chinese missile destroyer "Fuzhou" fired a Sunburn with a practice warhead, which high-speed cameras then recorded striking the center of the white cross on the hull of the target vessel, located more than 60 nautical miles away from the firing point. Terminal attack profile was Mach 2.05 at an altitude of 22 feet.
Why haven’t the American news Media informed out people that Saudi Arabia has kicked the U.S.A. out of it huge air base there and that the Chinese are already moving in?!
Perhaps for the first time in contemporary American history, Washington was being forced to come to grips with a new and very harsh reality.
Though the United States was allowed [in fact discreetly encouraged] to become horribly bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq, it was no longer allowed to interfere anywhere else in the world.
Massive American aircraft carriers were no longer free to roam around looking for helpless prey, and Russia or China, sometimes both in tandem, started riding shotgun on all American adventures in the Eastern Hemisphere.
The gloves were off, and with American and Israel still unable to steal any oil from Iraq because someone keeps blowing the pipelines, this Russian and Chinese firepower buildup suddenly slammed the door firmly shut on Caspian oil reserves in the old Soviet republics.
For more than a decade American oil multinationals have been conducting "joint ventures" in the former Soviet republics bordering the Caspian Sea, with the stated intent of pumping this stolen crude oil out through Turkey, then on to
western markets. Now this route has been blocked permanently, and America is in no position to do anything about it, because a large part of the U.S. conventional army is currently bogged down in Iraq, being shot at and killed on a daily basis.
Friends, my personal fear is that the modern Israelis are doing exactly what was said prophetically of Edom. We also need to remember what the Apostle Paul, defined heavenly Jerusalem.
I believe the activity taking place among the Israeli in Palestine can be the culmination of "I have loved you (Israel) saith the Lord. Yet ye say, Wherein have ye loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the Lord: yet I loved Jacob and hated Esau, and laid his mountains and heritage waste ...
Whereas Edom (the Jews) saith, We will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the Lord of hosts, They shall build, and I (God) will throw down; and they (true Israel) shall call them, The border of wickedness, The people against whom the Lord hath indignation forever"
- Malachi 1:2-4
"For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.
Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free."
- Apostle Paul, Gal. 4:22-31
Let us conclude with the final comments of the Apostle Jude: "But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost, Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.
And of some have compassion, making a difference:
And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.
Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, To the only wise God, our Savior, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen."
Jude 20 - 25
Thanks for your patience in reading this lengthy article. Hope it was worth it. God Bless.
Latest E-Book Entitled:
" After A Long Train Of Abuse . . . "
Notes On The U.S. Constitution
Compiled And Edited by Jeffrey Brackeen
Is Now Available And Free If You Become A Member . . . .
For More Information Click Here
THE COMPLETE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST
This is a work
which has taken years of research
to compile and
edit. Each of these Gospels has been edited to bring them from archaic idioms into contemporary English and then arranged chronologically
to present a harmonious sequence.
We Value Your Comments.
Become A member! Gain Access To The Members Area More?
FORBIDDEN TRUTHS REVEALED
Using the latest research from the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Nag Hammadi Codices, as well as other ancient Essene writings and recent findings,
Mr Brackeen has unlocked the secret Symbols and Codes found in John's Revelation.
Tampa Web Design
Tampa, St. Petersburg Web Design