HOW FREE ARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?
EVENTS IN EARLY AMERICA
SOME FORGOTTEN HISTORY, STARTING WITH ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE
LETTER FROM POPE INNOCENT III TO KING JOHN, JULY 6, 1213
POPE REJECTS THE LIBERTIES GRANTED BY THE MAGNA CARTA
THE BARONS AND NOBLES RESORT TO REVOLUTION THE GREAT REFORMATION JESUITS IN HIDING
WILLIAM OF ORANGE
"And if ye go to war in your land against the enemy that oppresseth you, then ye shall blow an alarm with the trumpets; and ye shall be remembered before the LORD your God, and ye shall be saved from your enemies." - Num. 10:9
THE BATTLE OF ARMAGEDDON
"But this people [is] robbed and spoiled; [they are] all of them trapped in holes, and they are hid in prison houses:" "They are for a prey, and no-one delivereth [them]; for a spoil, and none saith, Restore [them]. Who among you will give ear to this? [Who] will hearken and hear for the time to come?" - Isa. 42:22-23
HOW FREE ARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?
Recently, I listened to a pop tune on the radio, which said, "Thank God I am an American, where, at least I know I am free . . ."
Obviously, the singer believed what he was singing, but I suspect he might be shocked if he really knew the truth.
Actually, we are a people who have been robbed and spoiled and some of our best citizens are locked up in prisons, at this moment.
Jesus once told some of his countrymen, "If the Son shall make you free, you will be free indeed."
If you like ‘conspiracy theories’, you just might enjoy this series.
We’re going to be looking at how the United States of America got into the mess, we find ourselves in today and in so doing, we’ll be examining the disastrous influence of three entities upon our benighted land: The British Monarchy, the Vatican and Jewish/Zionism.
There actually are many ‘conspiracies in this world, but few of them affect us directly, yet, these do! Surprisingly, some of those groups which we would expect to be antagonist to each other, have agreed to work together in the achievement of certain goals.
The fruits of their labors, after so many years, are now being made manifest for all the world to see.
The problem with ‘conspiracy’ publications is they tend to leave the reader with a feeling of resignation and impotence.
We already have too many ‘other-worldly’ Christians, who don’t believe in ‘polishing brass on a sinking ship’. But if we really understood our enemy and knew what he is seeking to accomplish, I believe we would be greatly motivated to thwart him.
"The great Dragon . . .the old Serpent, called the Devil and Satan which deceives the whole world, was cast out (from heaven) onto the earth, and his angels were cast out with him."
- Rev. 12:9
Concerning whom, we are warned, "WOE to the inhabitants of the earth and of the sea, for the Devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has but a short time."
- Rev. 12:12
"BE SOBER, BE VIGILANT, because your adversary, the Devil walks about, like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour."
- I Pet. 5:8
These warning are meant not just for individuals but for entire nations, as well. "He was a murderer from the beginning and did not abide in the Truth, because there is no truth in him."
- Jn. 8:44
His gig is up. Every passing day reveals his plans and conspiracies. And yes, he does use unsuspecting individuals to fulfill his evil designs.
Christ told us, "Do not fear them, for there is nothing hidden that shall not be revealed."
The workers of Iniquity will be exposed for what they are. And men will revile them. He also assured us that before he returns at the end of the Age,
"He shall put down all Rule, all Authority, and Power, for He must reign until he has subdued all ENEMIES under his feet."
- I Cor. 15:24, 25
And I believe that we are called upon to overcome Satan’s schemes by our word and testimony.
We have come to a time and place where whole countries are about to be destroyed, because Christians have swallowed a false ‘eschatology’ (an understanding of prophetic events).
During the 19th Century, a man named Cyrus Ingersol Scofield came up with a Bible, in which he placed abominable footnotes, at the bottom of the pages. He denied the present existence of the Kingdom of God and even the relevance of God’ s law for mankind.
He postponed the ‘kingdom’ to a future time, building upon the heresies of the Jesuit Ribera and the Plymouth Brethren false prophet, John Nelson Darby.
These false teachers taught that God has planned epochs of time ("dispensations") such as the "in-gathering of the Jews in the ancient land of Canaan".
One epoch, they say, includes the present time when Jews are obligated to build a Jewish temple and re-institute animal sacrifice. Such epochs or "dispensations" are necessary, they say before Christ can return.
Scofield said that Christ cannot return to earth until certain events occur: The Jews must return to Palestine, gain control of Jerusalem and rebuild a temple, and then we all must engage in the final, great battle called Armageddon. Scofield
posits two ‘bodies’; a spiritual body (the Church) and a physical body (the Jews). This teachings leads to a denial of the existence of the Kingdom of God now.
It stipulates that the ‘kingdom’ will come after the battle of Armageddon. The Scofield Reference Bible was first published by the Oxford Press controlled by the Rothschild family of Britain who have been major forces promoting a New World Order.
I make no apology for the fact that this article is long, but it is imperative for us to understand the Mind of God Vs the Stratagems of the Wicked One.
In order to truly understand what is happening in our world, I believe it is necessary to re-examine certain events, which we think we understand but may not. Let’s begin right here in good ol’ U.S.A.
EVENTS IN EARLY AMERICA
Prior to the War for Independence, the King of England had expended a good deal of treasure to prevent the French and Indians from containing the Colonists along the seaboard.
The French had built forts from Quebec clear down into what is now Illinois but the Colonists were in no mood to be hemmed in. Naturally, when the French and Indian war ended the King wanted to realize a return on his investment and the only way to do that was through taxes.
When the King’s men began placing taxes on various and sundry articles, the Americans became fearful and began a war to gain independence from England.
It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England, most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief, separation from England became the lesser of two evils.
The cry of freedom and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan "Don't Tread On Me" was the standard borne by the militias.
Thomas Jefferson’s concern was that we should not be taxed to death by the Crown, as was happening to the people in England.
"...And to preserve their independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.
We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude.
If we run into such debts as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, and give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they now do, on oatmeal and potatoes; have not time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account; but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow sufferers..."
- THE MAKING OF AMERICA, p. 395
Because of their immediate struggle and their examination of the question of self-government, the American people were vigilant and very cautious. They were virtuous and God- fearing Protestants with a few Catholics and Baptists thrown in.
But, knowing the nature of the human animal, Thomas Jefferson warned that even if they did win the war: "Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless... the time for fixing every essential right on a legal basis is [now] while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united.
From the conclusion of this war we shall be going downhill. It will not then be necessary to resort, every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded.
They will forget themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion."
- Thomas Jefferson
Most Americans believe that when Lord Cornwallis, surrendered his sword to George Washington, that the King’s war against the ‘rebels’ was over. But the truth is, all we did was win the first round.
Jonathan Williams recorded in his book, Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his surrender that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.". . . . "in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government.
That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire."
All the Paris Treaty did, was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies.
At the same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still being created today; millions of dollars a day. And his heirs and successors are still reaping the benefit of the king’s original venture.
If you will read the quote from Title 26, you will see just one situation where the king is still collecting a tax from those that receive a benefit from him, on property which is purchased with the money the king supplies, at almost the same percentage.
If you will notice, the Treaty of Paris, which concluded the War for Independence, has the King still claiming dominion over the United States. " It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God,
king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America,
to forget all past misunderstandings and differences that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore, and to establish such a beneficial and satisfactory intercourse, between the two countries upon the ground of reciprocal advantages and mutual convenience as may promote and secure to both perpetual peace and harmony . . ."
A new war was declared after the Treaty was signed. The king wanted his land back and he knew he would be able to regain his property for his heirs with the help of his world financiers. Here is a quote from the King speaking to Parliament after the War for Independence was over.
Six weeks after the capitulation of Yorktown, the king of Great Britain, in his speech to Parliament (Nov. 27, 1781), declared "That he should not answer the trust committed to the sovereign of a free people, if he consented to sacrifice either to his own desire of peace, or to their temporary ease and relief, those essential rights and permanent interests, upon the maintenance and preservation of which the future strength and security of the country must forever depend."
The determined language of this speech, pointing to the continuance of the American war, was echoed back by a majority of both Lords and Commons.
In a few days after (Dec. 12), it was moved in the House of Commons that a resolution should be adopted, declaring it to be their opinion "That all farther attempts to reduce the Americans to obedience by force would be ineffectual, and injurious to the true interests of Great Britain."
What were the true interests of the king? The gold, silver and copper. The new war was to be fought without Americans being aware that a war was even being waged, it was to be fought by subterfuge and key personnel being placed in key positions.
The King agreed to let the people of the United States use and hold the land but he wanted a piece of all gold, silver and copper mined in the United States.
Article IX. And moreover, we do GRANT and agree, for Us, our Heirs and Successors, that the said several Councils, of and for the said several Colonies, shall and lawfully may, by Virtue hereof, from time to time,
without any Interruption of Us, our Heirs, or Successors, give and take Order, to dig, mine, and search for all Manner of Mines of Gold, Silver, and Copper, as well within any part of their said several Colonies, as for the said main Lands on the Back-side of the same Colonies;
And to Have and enjoy the Gold, Silver, and Copper, to be gotten thereof, to the Use and Behoof of the same Colonies, and the Plantations thereof; YIELDING therefore, to Us, our Heirs and Successors, the fifth Part only of all the same Gold and Silver, and the fifteenth Part of all the same Copper,
so to be gotten or had, as is aforesaid, without any other Manner or Profit or Account, to be given or yielded to Us, our Heirs, or Successors, for or in Respect of the same."
Now the creditors of the United States which included the King, wanted to be paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol.
The people resisted, so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax, which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion.
At this point, the thirteen Colonies were under the ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION, which did not provide for a strong central government, that would protect them from the King’s lawyers and agents. The CONSTITUTION was drawn up by a group of men, who
basically were self appointed, but saw the need to strengthen the Colonists position.
These gentlemen did not wish to defraud the King of the revenues that were justly owed to him and the other investors, who had funded the Colonists, so they placed a provision in the Constitution, stating that existing Treaties and future Treaties took precedence over the Constitution and any other laws.
To do their work, they waited until Thomas Jefferson was abroad and would not be able to interfere with their designs.
Now, I am not saying that the U.S. Constitution was not a vast improvement over the Articles of Confederation, but I am saying that it had built in trap-doors that would permit the King’s revenuers great latitude in collecting monies owed to England.
Rothschild had said, "Give me control of a country’s money and I care not who writes the laws."
James Madison wrote, "History records that the money-changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent plans possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money, and its issuance."
What was needed at that time period was more people of the caliber of Patrick Henry.
This great man refused his appointment to the Philadelphia convention on the grounds that he "smelt a rat," and ferociously fought against ratification of the Constitution, claiming that it had been illegally prepared, declaring "What right had they to say ‘We the people’?"
Very pointedly, he warned that a future American government could grant: "...a great and mighty President the powers of a king.....
The licentious and wicked of the community will seize with avidity everything you hold."
Believe me, the Constitution which they drew up would never have been ratified by the people in the thirteen Colonies, no matter how many ‘Federalist Papers’ were printed trying to sell it.
It was only after the ten Amendments were added that the legislatures of each Colony ratified it. Even so, there were still unseen issues lurking in the background, just waiting to impinge on the Sovereignty of the people.
The fact that British troops occupied America, with their arms and ammunition, until 1796 (for seventeen more years), as required by the Jay Treaty. They departed at their leisure.
Actually, ‘We the People’ are serfs! The United States is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been.
How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution, as I have, and had the Judge tell you that you can't. It is because you are not a party to it.
If you don't believe this, read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states 'But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it.'..."
SOME FORGOTTEN HISTORY, STARTING WITH ELEANOR OF AQUITAINE
Eleanor of Aquitaine was, from the age of fifteen, the duchess of Aquitaine, a prosperous duchy in France. She was by far the richest and the most beautiful woman in Europe.
She was also the grand daughter of Duke William IX of Aquitaine, whose sobriquet was ‘the Troubadour’.
She married the King of France, Louis, but they separated amicably until she then married Henry of Anjou, who soon was to become Henry II of England. Since Henry, with this marriage ruled half of France as well as England, you can imagine that Louis was not pleased with this.
Eleanor and Henry did not get on well and even though they had five boys and two girls, they finished up estranged, with Eleanor more or less confined while Henry pursued his amours. Two of their sons were Richard the Lion Heart and King John, who signed the Magna Carta.
Richard the Lion Heart had gone off on a Crusade to Jerusalem and gotten himself captured by the Germans. While he was gone, his agents began seizing the estates of Barons and Nobles, who were away on the Crusade.
John, in his brother’s absence, behaved rather badly and upon reflection of his sinful life determined to bequeath the whole of England and Ireland to the Roman Catholic Pontiff.
A ‘Charta’ was written May 15, 1213, in which the king offered his kingdom to the Pope as reparation for his supposed sins against the Pope. The Pope accepted the king's offer, and a valuable consideration of a 1000 marks, later reduced to 666 marks.
LETTER FROM POPE INNOCENT III TO KING JOHN, JULY 6, 1213
"To Him, who from evil is able to bring forth good, we render thanks for having mercifully inspired you to make fitting reparation for the losses and wrongs inflicted upon the Church: for you have both accepted the form of reparation which had been prepared
after much consideration, and you have also put your person and territory under apostolic suzerainty by right of lordship making over in perpetuity to the Holy Roman Church your kingdoms of England and Ireland, to be held through the church and of the Church, subject to an annual payment of 700 marks for England and 300 marks for Ireland, as is more fully and explicitly contained in your legally framed charter."
Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III, concerning England (1198-1216), Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., 1956. page 149
[Below is a Quote from the second letter from the Pope, echoing the transfer of the king's property, to the Pope.]
Letter from Pope Innocent III, to King John, November 4, 1213 "....and manifestly grateful, in that, to make full amends for your sins, you have offered yourself and your property to God and the Church."
- Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III, concerning England (1198-1216), Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., 1956. Page 168
[The third letter below, is the legal closing of the contract, with the payment of the 1000 marks to the Pope, the signing of the document with the signatures of the witness, sealed with the king's golden seal.
This document declares that the contract between the king and the Pope was legal and binding on all parties, heirs and successors, forever. You will notice if you study closely the likeness in the legalize of these letters and the later Charters written by the king's barristers, regarding the incorporation of America.]
"....so that those provinces which from of old have had the Holy Roman Church as their proper teacher in spiritual matters should now in temporal things also have her as their peculiar sovereign.
You, whom God has chosen as a suitable minister to effect this, by a devout and spontaneous act of will and on the general advice of your barons have offered and yield, in the form of an annual payment of a thousand marks,
yourself and your kingdoms of England and Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances, the Holy Roman Church and to us and our successors, to be our right and our property as is stated in your official letter attested by a golden seal."
POPE REJECTS THE LIBERTIES GRANTED BY THE MAGNA CARTA
While these events were transpiring, the Barons corralled the King and made him an offer, he could not refuse, if you know what I mean. They wanted their estates and manors back, plus an agreement granting certain ‘rights’ and ‘liberties’.
On May 9, 1215, the King proposed to the Barons "arbitration" before a court consisting of representatives of himself, of the Barons and of the Pope, after the Barons had besieged the royal castle at Northampton.
This proposal was rejected by the Barons. And they answered on May 17, 1215, by capturing London.
The King's negotiators, who included Archbishop Langton, finally effected an agreement with the Barons, about June 10, 1215, at a conference at Runnymede, that was signed and sealed by King John on or about the date that the Magna Carta bears, June 15, 1215.
The Pope in Rome was not happy to hear about the revolt, so he sent an envoy to England to make special concession. When the aforesaid envoys returned to England and the king offered, in accordance with the terms of our mandate, to grant the barons full justice.
This they altogether rejected and began to stretch forth their hands to deeds still worse. The envoies contended:
"So the king, appealing to our tribunal, offered to grant them justice before us to whom the decision of this suit belonged by reason of our lordship: but this they utterly rejected.
Then he offered that four discreet men chosen by him and four more chosen by themselves should, together with us, end the dispute, and he promised that, first in his reforms, he would repeal all abuses introduced into England in his reign: but this also they contemptuously refused.
"Finally, THE KING DECLARED TO THEM THAT, SINCE THE LORDSHIP OF THE KINGDOM BELONGED TO THE ROMAN CHURCH, HE NEITHER COULD, NOR SHOULD, WITHOUT OUR SPECIAL MANDATE, MAKE ANY CHANGE IN IT TO OUR PREJUDICE:
and so he again appealed to our tribunal, placing under apostolic protection both himself and his kingdom with all his honor and rights. But making no progress by any method, he asked the archbishop and the bishops to execute our mandate, to defend the rights of the Roman Church, and to protect himself in accordance with the form of the privilege granted to Crusaders.
"But before the envoys bearing this wise and just mandate and reached England, the Barons threw over their oath of fealty;
and through, even if the king had wrongfully oppressed them, they should not have proceeded against him by constituting themselves both judges and executors of the judgement in their own suit, yet, openly conspiring as vassals against their lord and as knights against their king, they leagued themselves with his acknowledged enemies as well as with others,
and dared to make war on him, occupying and devastating his territory and even seizing the city of London, the capital of the kingdom, which had been treacherously surrendered to them.
"When the Archbishop and Bishops would not take any action, seeing himself bereft of almost all counsel and help, he did not dare to refuse what the Barons had dared to demand.
And so by such violence and fear as might affect the most courageous of men he was forced to demeaning but also illegal and unjust, thereby lessening unduly and impairing his royal rights and dignity....we refuse to ignore such shameless presumption,
for thereby the Apostolic See would be dishonored, the king's rights injured, the English nation shamed, and the whole plan for a Crusade seriously endangered;
"and as this danger would be imminent if concessions, thus extorted from a great prince who has taken the cross, were not cancelled by our authority, even though he himself should prefer them to be upheld, on behalf of Almighty God, Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit, and by the authority of SS Peter and Paul His Apostles, and by our own authority, acting on the general advice of our brethren, we utterly reject and condemn this settle
ment, and under threat of excommunication we order that the king should not dare to observe it and that the barons and their associates should not require it to be observed:
The Charter, with all undertakings and guarantees whether confirming it or resulting from it, we declare to be null, and void of all validity for ever.
Wherefore, let no man deem it lawful to infringe this document of our annulment and prohibition, or presume to oppose it.
If anyone should presume to do so, let him know that he will incur the anger of Almighty God and of SS Peter and Paul His."
After he had been forced to sign the Magna Carta by threat of defeat by the barons, King John sent word of it, by envoy, to the Pope. The envoys returned several months later, bearing Papal bulls, dated August 24 and 25.
Pope Innocent III declared the Magna Carta to be: "...unlawful and unjust as it is base and shameful...whereby the Apostolic See is brought into contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English outraged, and the whole Enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled." (211:14)
On these grounds and on the ground that "the king had been compelled to enter upon it by force and fear" (211:14), and On the implied ground that it violated the basic tenets of Christianity in its denial of dictatorial rights to him and his henchmen,
POPE INNOCENT III DENIED ON BEHALF OF THE CHURCH THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AS EMBODIED IN THE MAGNA CARTA, BECAUSE POSSESSION OF RIGHTS BY ANYONE VIOLATES THE TENETS OF THE CHURCH.
THE BARONS AND NOBLES RESORT TO REVOLUTION
The Papal bulls were greeted by the barons with a resumption of the civil war in England.
The Pope was so enraged at the failure of Archbishop of Canterbury Langton to destroy the rebellious Barons and carry out the orders incorporated in his bull, that he suspended him from his office when he visited Rome at the end of September 1215, to attend the Fourth Lateran Council.
Undoubtedly with the consent, and probably at the direction of the Vatican, the French invaded England under Prince Louis and joined forces in a treacherous alliance with the Barons, as pretender to the throne of King John.
The sudden death of King John, in October 1216, brought to the throne his nine-year-old son, as King Henry III.
His supporters revived the Magna Carta to appease the barons and gain their support against the pretender who was badly routed.
These circumstances barred any further effective opposition to the Magna Carta by the Pope, without risking loss of the 666 pounds tribute."
Thomas Aquinas, Rome's "Angelic Doctor" wrote in his Summa Theologica in 1272: "The Pope, by Divine Right, has spiritual and Temporal Power, as supreme king of the World: ..." In other words, all kings should take their orders for the Pope, who is king over all kings.!!!
Lucius Ferraris wrote in his Bibliothica Prompta (1763), which has been adopted as a standard of Roman Catholic law, as follows: "On account of the excellence of his supreme dignity, he is called Bishop of Bishops, Ordinary of Ordinaries, universal Bishop of the Church, Bishop or Diocesan of the world, divine Monarch, supreme Emperor and King of Kings."
In those days, the Society of Jesus did not exist, so the Pope had to rely upon his Archbishops, Bishops and priests to get anything done.
This was not always the most efficient way to get things done. He did have the Knights of Malta, but the Papacy would have to wait until 1536 when Ignatius Loyola started his amazing Order, which today, are often refereed to as the ‘Jesuits’.
The Pope's authority to inject his will in Britain and her possession, was made possible by what happened in the 1213 Charta.
The King became a tenant and trustee of the Pope, again proof of this is the fact that a rent was paid by the King to the Pope.
The Pope was therefore a legal party to whatever transpired in England, concerning his new possessions. According to the Jesuits - the foot soldiers of the Vatican, these statements are based on contract law, which the courts would have to uphold.
Hence, according to the Vatican, the 1689 Bill of Rights, has no relevance.
THE GREAT REFORMATION
In the following years, much of Europe would break away from the Vatican and started their own national churches, costing the Vatican vast sums of revenue.
Loyola had an indomitable will - a will of steel, and he set his mind to regain back what the Papacy had lost to the Reformation.
And so, he went to the Pope, and the Pope in 1540 created the Jesuit Order. But this man is a soldier, he’s a lawyer, and he put together a legion of soldiers and warriors to get back what Rome had lost, as well as institute a World Government for the Pope, from Jerusalem. This was in 1540.
After the Reformation, we have a warfare between the Council of Trent and the doctrines of the Reformation, particularly as outlined by John Calvin in his Institutes Of The Christian Religion.
Calvin  wrote the Institutes Of The Christian Religion, he finished it when he was 27, and he dedicated it to the King of France. And because the Jesuits so hated him, he was driven from France and he resided in Geneva to the day of his death, when he became Governor of Geneva.
So, now, it’s Calvin and his Institutes Of The Christian Religion vs. Loyola and his Council of Trent, if you want it sewed-up in two major documents.
The Council of Trent was from 1545-1563 - eighteen years. And Trent is a little town in Italy. So, it was a Council that took place in the town of Trent, Italy.
The Council of Trent consists of 25 Sessions. Those 25 Sessions accurse and condemn all the doctrines of the Reformation.
It condemns anybody who does not
believe that the literal Jesus Christ is in the host [holy communion bread], and that his literal blood is in the wine.
That’s called transubstantiation. Anybody who does not believe that is an accursed anathema. Anybody who believes that their salvation is outside the Catholic Church is accursed anathema.
Anybody who believes in justification by grace through faith—anathema, accursed. Anybody who believes that the Pope is not the vicar of Christ—accursed, anathema.
In the 4th Session, which is probably the most important Session, the Jesuits condemn freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of conscience. So, no man has the right to choose his own religion; no man has the right to publish what he feels is the truth; and no man has the right to freedom of conscience.
JESUITS IN HIDING
The Order of the SOCIETY OF JESUS was abolished 39 times from different kingdoms throughout Europe, because of their nefarious deeds. In 1639, the Jesuits were also expelled from Japan.
Apparently the Jesuits never forgot that. Even after being expelled, they caused Japan to be bombed into submission 200 years later. Remember the words of Abraham Lincoln: "The Jesuits never forget nor forsake."
However, the Jesuits were also protected during their suppression in England. A very wealthy landowner—and you will find this in Ridpath’s History Of The World—gave his wonderful, beautiful estate Stonyhurst to the Jesuit Order.
And from then on, the Jesuits received protection from King George III, and you will find that in Mitchell’s The Jesuits. Mitchell is an English historian.
King George III was used by the Jesuits to restore their power in Europe, after the Napoleonic Wars, after they had punished the Pope and the monarchs. Louis XVIII was in exile, in England, in King George’s own parlor, waiting for the end of the Napoleonic Wars.
So, the Jesuits put Louis XVIII back on the throne. He readmitted the Jesuits, started the Inquisition, just like they did with Ferdinand VII when they restored him to power in Spain after the Napoleonic Wars.
Madame Blavatsky observed that the Catholic Society of Jesuits had transferred their headquarters from the continent to England where they plotted to plunge man into passive ignorance and institute "Universal Despotism". The founder of the Theosophical Society, a woman of immense intellect and with first hand experience of secret societies, warned:Students of Occultism should know that while the Jesuits have by their devices contrived to make the world in general, and Englishmen in particular think there is no such thing as Magic and laugh at Black Magic, these astute and wily schemers themselves hold magnetic circles and form magnetic chains by the concentration of their collective WILL, and when they have any special object to effect or any particular and important person to influence. - Letters of H. P. Blavatsky as quoted in The Occult Establishment by James Webb
Blavatsky also believed that the "Atlantis-race became a nation of wicked magicians" and that Atlantis was destroyed by a conspiracy of evil magicians who had seized control of the mighty continent.
Since Britain's rejection of the Catholic Church in 1689, when they cast off the Pope's religion and bulls, for the Protestant religion, the Pope has used any means to regain control. This needs to be understood by every person in the World, for knowledge is freedom and it will change our World.
The Edict of Nantes was put forward by King Henry IV. King Henry IV was a Roman Catholic, but he converted to Protestantism and he became a Huguenot.
But he was not allowed to take the throne of France until he renounced his Protestantism. So, for the sake of the kingdom, he renounced his Protestantism, and in 1610 issued forth the Edict of Nantes.
When that Edict was reversed by another king, it unleashed the horrors of the St. Barthomew’s Massacre and the French Revolution.
Alexander Dumas wrote about these events in his The Count Of Monte Cristo. The Count is the Jesuit General. Monte=Mount, Cristo=Christ. The Count of the Mount of Christ. Alexander Dumas was talking about the Jesuit General getting vengeance when the Jesuits were suppressed, and many of them were
consigned to an island, three hours sailing, West, off the coast of Portugal. And so, when the Jesuits finally regained their power, they punished all of the monarchs of Europe who had suppressed them, drove them from their thrones, including the Knights of Malta from Malta, using Napoleon.
And Alexander Dumas, who fought for the Italian patriots in 1848, to free Rome from the temporal power of the Pope, wrote many books and one of the books was to expose this, and that was The Count Of Monte Cristo.
WILLIAM OF ORANGE
Williams of Orange was the father of religious liberty. William of Orange is the man who gave the Jews the freedom to come to Amsterdam. And the Jews called Amsterdam, "the new Jerusalem".
William of Orange was a Catholic to begin with. Remember when he was in the forest, hunting with the king of France, and the king of France lay bare to him their plans to destroy all the Protestants in Holland, William kept silent.
And that’s why he was called "William the taciturn" or "William the silent". So, he harbored all of this in his heart, and he went back to Holland determined that he would deliver the Calvinists and the Protestants from this annihilation.
It was William of Orange who seized the Throne of Britain in the Glorious Revolution and proceeded to see founded the Bank of England, (1694) the Masons, and the Royal Society under his patronage to say nothing of the British Empire itself, the embryo of the current World Order according to H G Wells and others.
The House of Orange founded the Bilderberg Society through Prince Berhard, the husband of Queen Juliana (of the House of Orange and Queen of the Netherlands.
The establishment of the first true sovereign republic in 1789 U.S. under its Federal Constitution, represented a deadly threat to the combined feudalistic and Liberal-financier interest of Europe.
The risk that the U.S. model might become the basis for a constitutional reconstitution of France's monarchy, was therefore a development which the leading private financier interests were determined to crush at all costs.
A leading circle of such financier interests, composed of the rival but connected interests of Lord Shelburne's British East India Company and a circle of chiefly Protestant French-speaking Swiss private bankers, such as Jacques Necker and Mallet du Pan, created in France then what has become known today as the Synarchist International of the Twentieth Century and today.
The immediate focus of this effort to crush the influence of U.S. Independence, was the 1781-1783 pre-orchestration of the French Revolution by the most powerful figure of the emerging British world empire, Lord Shelburne.
Shelburne who was the leading figure of both Barings bank and the British East India Company, was the chief original sponsor of this process of intervention leading into the France developments of 1789-1815.
The most relevant developments which are to be attributed directly and explicitly to Shelburne, date from 1763. It was a network of private bankers and others, allied to Shelburne, a network built up and directed by Shelburne, which operated through the Netherlands and down into the area of French-speaking Switzerland, which orchestrated the crucial features of the built-up toward and initiation of the French Revolution.
This was most emphatically the case from the period of Shelburne's 1782-1783 role as British Prime Minister. That’s all for this Part. Now go to Part 2.
May God bless you and yours. As ever, Jeffrey Brackeen
Latest E-Book Entitled:
" After A Long Train Of Abuse . . . "
Notes On The U.S. Constitution
Compiled And Edited by Jeffrey Brackeen
Is Now Available And Free If You Become A Member . . . .
For More Information Click Here
THE COMPLETE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST
This is a work
which has taken years of research
to compile and
edit. Each of these Gospels has been edited to bring them from archaic idioms into contemporary English and then arranged chronologically
to present a harmonious sequence.
We Value Your Comments.
Become A member! Gain Access To The Members Area More?
FORBIDDEN TRUTHS REVEALED
Using the latest research from the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Nag Hammadi Codices, as well as other ancient Essene writings and recent findings,
Mr Brackeen has unlocked the secret Symbols and Codes found in John's Revelation.
Tampa Web Design
Tampa, St. Petersburg Web Design